Friday, March 30, 2012

Let’s Make This Clear: Jordan is Palestine

Listen, Palestinian Arabs, If you want to march, march on Jordan.
By Matthew M. Hausman, Att’y
[Matthew M. Hausman is a trial attorney and writer who lives and works in Connecticut. A former journalist He is also one of the people who I have co-opted to support this cause.]
The “Jordan-is-Palestine” option for resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict is an idea that, despite history and logic, was beaten into silence by Israel’s enemies and detractors. Critics denounced the concept as preposterous, reactionary and counterproductive.
And yet, the idea has been resurrected from within Jordan itself. There can be no dispute that Jordan was created in a sovereign vacuum on land that had comprised most of the Palestine Mandate. However, its creation as Transjordan in 1921 satisfied a geopolitical need unencumbered by a Palestinian national myth that had not yet been invented.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

New Documentary about Israel is a left-wing hit piece "Five Broken Cameras"

At Sundance, view of Israel ranges from critical to abysmal

"....The film (Five Broken Pieces) is one-sided and the impact is devastating. No mention is made of the more than 1,000 Israelis who died in Palestinian terrorist attacks in the decade before there was a West Bank security fence, no mention of the soldier who lost an eye in 2005 when he was struck by a rock thrown by a Bil’in resident. We never hear an Israeli commander explain why the IDF chose its tactics...."


Five Broken Cameras Shown As Part Of Nashville Film Festival at David Lipscomb University




Monday, March 26, 2012

Israeli Government’s Gift to J Street: Truth Served Straight Up The address of the embassy's No. 2 sparked a gala dinner tiff, but then former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert also got into hot water with the crowd.

The No. 2 at the Israeli Embassy in Washington took the stage at J Street’s gala dinner tonight with a polite, impeccably structured point-by-point barrage of the risks faced by the Jewish state and where the lobbying organization has slipped.
It sparked a battle of sorts at the event, with former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert taking the beginning of his address to slam the Israeli government for sending the diplomat to speak — but then launching into similar points on Iran that provoked the same chilly reaction from the crowd.

READ MORE

Sunday, March 25, 2012

J Street Defends Occupy Wall Street's Anti-Semitism

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/03/21/j-street-clumsy-defense-occupy-wall-street-anti-semitism/


It’s always difficult to untangle when J Street officials actually believe in the anti-Israel policies and anti-Semitic rhetoric that they push and defend, and when they’re just following the commands of donors. The group’s president Jeremy Ben-Ami raised eyebrows by voluntarily injecting himself on the side of anti-Jewish language during the “Israel-Firster” debate, and then later it turned out that J Street had a potential financial incentive to take that stance. On the other hand the group and its partisans seem genuinely enthused about rolling out the red carpet for Peter Beinart and his exhortation to economically suffocate Israelis who don’t live where he tells them. As for J Street’s call on Obama to pressure Israel in the aftermath of the Flotilla even though the Israelis were in the right on self-defense, that simply had an incoherence borne of conflicted priorities.
So it’s impossible to know which dynamic — donor pressure or personal passion — was at work when J Street officials defended Occupy Wall Street from criticism of its disgraceful and extensively documented anti-Semitism. In favor of the donor theory, there’s the fact that J Street funder George Soros backed Occupy. On the side of the labor of love theory, there turn out to be deep sociological, institutional, and personal ties between pro-Occupy radicals and J Street officials – so much so that those radicals are now officially “partnering” with J Street on this weekend’s conference.
Most likely it was a little of Column A and a little of Column B, with J Street officials being genuinely sympathetic but wary about the optics of supporting yet another group of anti-Semites.
The debate revolves around a statement by self-declared “Jewish leaders” who, per the statement title, set out to “Denounce Right-Wing Smears of Occupy Wall Street.” The piece specifically attacked the Emergency Committee for Israel, a J Street  bĂȘte noire and a major force behind the electoral wipe out of J Street candidates in the 2010 election. Ben-Ami’s name was one of about a dozen on the bottom of the statement, and the press contact for the entire release was J Street VP Carinne Luck.
The upcoming conference will have a core, recognized, pro-Occupy new media presence. The leftwing Jewschool site recently announced that it was going to “partner with J Street” on the conference, including dispatching sponsored bloggers to cover the events. Jewschool actively pushed Occupy and continues to do so, with the most recent sympathetic post getting published just last week. “We are the 99%,” declared another post. An admittedly inaccurate Google site search for “occupy wall street” turns up over 700 hits.
It turns out that J Street officials and Jewschool officials have demonstrably been cooperating to insulate Occupy. For instance, an early version of J Street’s toe-in-the-water press release was published on a site called Occupy Judaism (later versions had additional press contacts). Daniel Sieradski, founding publisher and former editor-in-chief of Jewschool owns the site. I’d direct you to the original statement on Sieradski’s site but the whole blog was taken down some time this morning, after I searched for it and found it last night. Luckily it’s still cached here.
J Street officials and Jewschool activists have long worked together to paper over the anti-Semitism of Occupy Wall Street, albeit sometimes with each being once removed from their home organizations. It would be hard to think of two more appropriate “partners” for the J Street conference.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

The True Perpetrators of The Antisemitic Attacks

by Barry Rubin


What a tragic, evil joke. A drive-by shooter in the beautiful, almost magical, city of Toulouse, France, murders three Jewish children and a teacher in front of their school. Various VIPs issue statements about how terrible is this deed, how unspeakable.
And yet at that very moment, the next round of murders, the next slanderous and inciting antisemitic lies are being perpetrated by respectable people and institutions. There is no real soul-searching, no true effort to do better, no serious examination about how the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hysteria is paving the way for murder and fueling dreams of genocide.

The street thugs, fanatics drunk on the interpretations of Islam they are being fed, and the mentally twisted may be pulling the trigger but the distinguished, the powerful, and the honored are providing the ammunition.

READ MORE

Qaida-linked Islamist wanted to 'avenge Palestinian children'

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=3603



300 French police corner Mohammed Merah, a 24-year-old Frenchman of Algerian origin, in Toulouse apartment • “The Jews have killed our brothers and sisters in Palestine,” Merah said, adding that he had uploaded a video of the attack onto the Internet.
Boaz Bismuth, News Agencies and Israel Hayom Staff

Police cordon off the neighborhood in which a standoff with the Toulouse school murder suspect is taking place.
|
Photo credit: Reuters

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Protestors Decry Presentation on “Islamophobia” at JCC Over 30 protestors gathered in front of the JCC in Manhattan to express their outrage over a forum entitled “Combating Islamophobia.”

READ MORE



Protestors Decry Presentation on "Islamophobia" at JCC
Over 30 protestors gathered in front of the JCC in Manhattan to express their outrage over a forum entitled "Combating Islamophobia."

By Phyllis Chesler & Fern Sidman
First Publish: 3/16/2012, 10:07 PM
On Wednesday evening, March 14th ,over 30 protestors representing both Jewish and human rights organizations gathered in front of the Jewish Community Center on Manhattan's upper west side to express their outrage over a forum entitled "Combating Islamophobia."

Moderated by former first daughter Chelsea Clinton, the panelists included Rabbi Marc Schneier, co-founder of the Foundation For Ethnic Understanding, which fosters "twinning" programs between mosques and synagogues and Imam Shamsi-Ali, the spiritual leader of the Islamic Cultural Center of New York and the chairman of the Al-Hikmah mosque in Astoria.

Holding aloft signs and banners reading "What Are Muslims Doing for Peace???", "Burning Churches, Honor Murdering Women. Where is the Muslim Protest?", "Sharia Equals Death", "Since 9/11, Radical Islamists Committed 11,961 Attacks, Killed 75,038, Injured 115,255", "Wake Up! Islam's Goal: Destruction of Our Way of Life", "Stop Billions of Saudi Oil Monet Funding Worldwide Radical Islamic Intolerance and Terror", "The Right of Jews to a Jewish State in Israel," "The Right of Muslims to Convert to Other Religions," the protestors took aim at what they perceived to be the hypocrisy that this event represented...............




Barak Warns Iran Nuclear Program Soon to be Strike-Proof


Iran's nuclear program will soon be strike-proof, according to Defense Minister Ehud Barak.
By Chana Ya'ar
First Publish: 3/19/2012, 5:55 PM

Ehud Barak
Ehud Barak
Flash 90
Iran's nuclear proram will soon be strike-proof, according to Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Speaking on Monday to the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Barak said the window of opportunity for a military strike is rapidly closing.
The Islamic Republic, he told the committee, is rushing to move its nuclear development facilities underground, and beyond the reach of any attack.
"The world, including the current U.S. administration, understands and accepts that Israel necessarily views the threat differently than they do,” Barak pointed out. “Ultimately Israel is responsible for taking the decisions related to its future, its security and its destiny.”
Iran's nuclear program is “steadily approaching maturation and verging on a 'zone of immunity,' - a position from which the Iranian regime could complete its program without effective disruption, at its convenience,” he added in a statement released by his office to reporters.
Israel's government leaders have been working in concert in recent weeks to accustom the population – and the rest of the world – to the idea that if necessary, due to the short time left before the sites are underground, the Jewish State is ready “go it alone” to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat. The US has bunker busters that could reach deep underground sites, but Israel's are more limited.
Last week, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu reminded the world in one of his fiercest speeches to the Knesset in some time, that Israel has "never left its fate to others, not even in the hands of its best friends."

Sunday, March 18, 2012

‘I have no doubt Demjanjuk was Ivan the Terrible,’ says Dalia Dorner

Following death of John Demjanjuk, retired Supreme Court justice Dalia Dorner defends her 1988 ruling convicting Demjanjuk for crimes of brutal Nazi guard known as “Ivan the Terrible” • Supreme Court overturned conviction in 1993 over reasonable doubt.


READ MORE

Saturday, March 17, 2012

BREAKING NEWS: VIDEO SUGGESTS CAIR USED ADL TALKING POINTS TO LOBBY AGAINST AMERICAN LAWS FOR AMERICAN COURTS LEGISLATION IN FLORIDA; TERROR-SUPPORTER AHMED BEDIER PRAISES ADL; NCJA LEADERS REITERATE CALL FOR ADL’S FOXMAN TO RESIGN

For Immediate Release

Contact: Beth Gilinsky bgilinsky@gmail.com
Lori Lowenthal Marcus lorilowenthalmarcus@gmail.com
Dr. Herbert I. London herb@hudson.org

New York, March 16, 2012 -- The National Conference on Jewish Affairs has just received a video taped by the United West on February 28, 2012 in Tallahassee, Florida.

Ahmed Bedier is former Communications Director for the Florida chapter of CAIR, a Hezbollah supporter, and attended a pro-Hamas rally in 2008 and is a compatriot of Sami Al-Arian, the Palestinian Arab Islamic Jihad operative who was found guilty of raising money for and lending support to Palestinian Islamic Jihad.  Bedier is seen at the beginning of the video praising the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).  According to Discover the Networks:

"Bedier has had ties to radical Islam since at least 2002, when he was the Outreach Director for the Islamic Society of Pinellas County (Florida), a mosque whose website features material calling for violence against Jews. Moreover, he has cultivated relationships with organizations and individuals connected to anti-Israel terrorist groups overseas, including HamasPalestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and Hezbollah."

Earlier this week, the NCJA expressed dismay at reports that the ADL and CAIR lobbied to defeat Florida legislation that would have restricted state courts from considering foreign laws as part of any legal proceeding or decision.

NCJA learned that the ADL sent a letter to Senator Mike Haridopolos, Florida Senate President, urging the Senate to oppose SB 1360 on the grounds that it is “an obstacle to Jewish divorce and remarriage, and an infringement on religious freedom.” CAIR hailed its “Shariah Victory” in Florida and acknowledged the ADL’s help: http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_display.cfm/blog_id/41102
CAIR was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding trial.
 
When the identical bill, HB1209, passed the Florida House of Representatives, the ADL expressed its “disappointment”:

 
READ MORE:

For further information on Bedier:

ADL calls Anti-Shariah Bill “pointless” –March 7, 2012

“Anti-Shariah” bill dies in Senate:

More on CAIR:
 
For a clear comparison of Shariah Law to Jewish law:

Bedier on Al-Arian deportation:
http://www.tampatrib.com/MGB4QU3F1ME.html

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

J Street in Trouble for Smearing Israel

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/03/14/j-street-smears-israel/

Last time Israel launched a defensive war in Gaza, J Street called for superpower intervention to restrain the IDF. The position put the ostensibly “pro-Israel” organization firmly on the other side of the Israeli government and three-fourths of the Israeli public, and at least in tension with the Palestinian Authority’s “it’s Hamas’s fault” position. But they’re still “pro-Israel” because their parents told them they could be anything they want when they grow up.
This time around, J Street partisans have settled on a less robust advocacy, mostly contenting themselves with catechisms about how “the majority of… Palestinians recognize that a two-state solution is the only means to achieve true peace and security.”
Still, two problems.

First, multiple different polls with multiple different questions have confirmed that of course it’s not the case  the majority of Palestinians embrace a two-state solution. Wishing doesn’t make it so. Second, J Street tried to stack even their minimal advocacy with an outrageous lie about anti-Palestinian Israeli atrocities. Via blogger Challah Hu Akbar, who caught the smear almost immediately:
J Street has released a statement on the recent rocket attacks against Israel’s southern communities and the IDF response. In this statement, J Street says… “Israel Defense Forces… have killed over a dozen Palestinian civilians.” This is an utter lie. Prior to Sunday, Israel had successfully killed 16 terrorists, who were either active in the Popular Resistance Committees or Islamic Jihad, and no civilians. Unfortunately, two civilians were killed on Sunday.
Challah then went on to list each and every terrorist who had been killed, complete with pictures and links to most of their online martyr bios. Martyr bios. While genocidal Palestinian groups were glorifying their cretins’ battlefield demise, J Street was calling those terrorists civilians. Apparently, they’re so incompetent they can’t even toe the Palestinian line correctly.
In fairness, J Street later deleted their false smear. But that hasn’t stopped Israeli outlets from painstakingly cataloging how everyone except the organization seemed to know the dead terrorists were in fact dead terrorists (the notable exception being EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton, who also seemingly didn’t know). And it hasn’t stopped Israeli MK Otniel Schneller from blasting the group:
“At a time when a million Israeli citizens have been living in bomb shelters for four days and four nights, have not gone to school or work and anxiously await the next siren, the terrorists firing on them are getting encouragement and support, not just from Iran and Hezbollah, but also from the left-wing Jewish American organization J Street,” Schneller said in the Knesset plenum on Tuesday. “The anti-Israel and anti-ethical statement of J Street should serve as a warning for Israeli politicians and left-wing activists, including members of my party, against supporting and identifying with J Street, as they have done in the past,” he added.
Schneller, by the by, turns out to be a Kadima MK. The forecast for former PM Ehud Olmert’s keynote at J Street’s upcoming conference is getting awfully frosty.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Nicky Larkin: Israel is a refuge, but a refuge under siege

Through making a film about the Israeli-Arab conflict, artist Nicky Larkin found his allegiances swaying

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Halacha, Sharia and the Religious Acceptance of Constitutional Governance by Rabbi Jon Hausman (October 2009)

Halacha, Sharia and the Religious Acceptance of Constitutional Governance

by Rabbi Jon Hausman (October 2009)
read entire article




".....Sharia would seem to have much in common with Halacha. Sharia means “the path” (as does the Hebrew word halacha at its etymological root) and, on its face might be described as the religious code for living the moral system according to Islamic tradition…perhaps, in the same way the Bible would serve for Christians. The question with Sharia (as with Halacha) is the same. At this point in time, is it the same kind of didactic and theoretical exercise in its application as is the application of the entire corpus of Jewish law? In the end, does the Rabbinic principle of ‘the law of the land is paramount’ apply in Islam?  
 
You peal back the layers and understand that Sharia refers both to the Islamic system of law and the totality of the Islamic way of life. It is based on the Qur’an and the Sunna (Islamic Custom or practice; particularly that associated with the exemplary life of the Prophet Muhammad, comprising his deeds and utterances as recorded in the hadith, hadith literally defined as "report" or "narrative" in Arabic). Whereas Judaism took the Torah and its commands as rubrics within which to live, and generations of interpretation explain a number of mitzvoth (Torah commandments) out of existence according to the principle of Torah Lo Bashamayim Hi (Torah exists here for us, not in Heaven), Sharia holds a different view. 
 
Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the direct word of Allah delivered to the last and greatest prophet Muhammad. Therefore, it is immutable, perfect, unchangeable, static, and unchanging. What can’t be derived from the Qur’an may be gleaned from the Sunna, which relates how Muhammad conducted his life in practice, and is considered by Muslims to be immutable for all time. 
 
So, if Muhammad used the pretext of a hudna or tahadiya (two Qur’anic terms meaning an impermanent cessation of military hostilities) to regroup and strengthen his forces for a future battle against the Banu Quraysh, killing and enslaving the Jews in Arabia, legitimizing the rape of women as a tactic in war, it applies today as a tactic. (Parenthetically, the treatment of Jews as described and prescribed in the Qur’an is particular graphic and loathsome…kill the Jew where one finds a Jew and do so for glory and honor.) If the punishment for rudd/apostasy, to a murtadd was death, then apostasy continues to be a capital offense. Homosexuality, adultery, freedom of speech issues when it comes to criticizing Islam or Muhammad or drawing satire cartoons such as the Jylland Posten satires by Kurt Westergaard are capital offenses under Islam (Does anyone remember the painting of the cross smear with feces, declared protected speech under the First Amendment? America’s Mayor Rudy Guilani had many issues with this piece of art. He expressed his displeasure verbally and did not show his patronage to the exhibit)…How does this impact our Bill of Rights as Islam is as it has always been, expansionary, supercessionist? Or, in the words of a number of its defenders in the US, Islam is not meant to be one amongst equals but to be the supreme law of the land?...."
 

CAIR “Hails Sharia Victory in Florida” with help from the ADL

http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_display.cfm/blog_id/41102#CurDomainURL%23/blog.cfm

by Jerry Gordon



CAIR Florida Director Hassan Shibley and Interfaith Supporters

SB1360 –a bill to provide constitutional protections against adoption of foreign laws by domestic State courts died in the Florida Senate last night.  The legislation was poised to pass the Senate before the session ended given the passage on March 1st of a companion measure HB1209 by a vote of 92 to 24 in the Florida House.  This important measure would have barred application of foreign laws from Islamic countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.   
What killed the bill was the emergence of opposition composed of Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR, fellow front group United Voices for America, the ACLU and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).  A last minute amendment introduced by Coral Gables Republican Sen. Miguel Diaz de la Portillo may have given Senate President Mike Haridopolos the opportunity to quash it.  That was doubtless in response to Ahmed Bedier former CAIR-Tampa executive director and founder of United Voices of America (UVA) who labeled the legislation as hateful to Muslims and in violation of constitutional guarantees of freedom of worship. He was particularly outraged by the sponsor of SB1360, Sen. Alan Hays, and Republican from Umatilla, who passed copies of an anti-Sharia booklet to fellow members stating that it was a threat to the US Constitution.
David Yerushalmi, Esq., author of the American Law for American Courts model law commented:
The people's representatives will do their job as they deem appropriate. If it passes, well. If not, there's always next legislative session with a new freshman class.
Hassan Shibley, the Florida CAIR director noted the interfaith supporters that contributed to the “shariah victory” :
This is a great success not only for the Muslim community, but for all Americans who believe in the constitutional protections of freedom of religion.

This sends a strong message that we will not tolerate legislation in America. Our victory tonight is a great example of how the interfaith and civil rights community united can make a positive difference for all Americans.
Among those interfaith supporters who killed the bill was the ADL.
The Florida regional executive director of the ADL, Andrew Rosenkranz, and just a few days before the scheduled vote on SB 1360 weighed in with the novel argument that the legislation would bar Bet Din, Jewish rabbinic courts in matters of domestic relations important to observant Jews.  In a March 7th press release, Rosenkranz of the ADL said:
This legislation addresses a non-existent threat, but what many don’t realize is that it would be harmful to the religious freedom of all Floridians, including observant Jews.
[. . .]
Through much of the debate on this bill, sponsors and supporters have represented that it has no relation to Islam. Therefore, we were troubled by yesterday’s news reports that the Senate Sponsor’s office was distributing materials about the purported threat of Sharia law (Islamic law) to America’s judicial system.
Rabbi Jon Housman, knowledgeable about the differences between Jewish Halacha and Shariah, disagreed with the ADL stance.  He noted that:
No jurisdiction recognizes the efficacy of a Get to dissolve a marriage, legal dissolution of which is controlled by State statute in every State and Territory of the US.
.
We noted in our post about the cozy relationship between Ahmed Bedier of UVA and the ADL on the eve of the Florida bill’s demise.
The ADL touts itself as “the 911 of the Jewish community,” claiming to protect the interests of Jewish-Americans. As can be gathered from its frequent fund raising solicitations, the ADL relies on the support of Jewish-Americans who wish to help fight against anti-Semitism and support the U.S.-Israel relationship. Yet there is a dark side to this organization that its leadership is careful to cover up. The truth is that the Anti-Defamation League quietly carries out a political agenda that assists the efforts of Islamic radicals and works against the safety of Jews, Israel and America itself.
 The long term national executive director of the ADL, Abe Foxman, has accused the author of ALAC, David Yerushalmi, Esq. of being an “extremist” and “racist bigot”.   
Under Foxman’s direction the ADL created the Interfaith Coalition on Mosques in 2010 in the wake of the Ground Zero Mosque protests in Manhattan. The ICOM filed an amicus brief in the controversial hearings held by the Rutherford County Chancery Court into the expansion of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro (ICM), Tennessee trumpeting such Mega-Mosque projects under the Religious Land Use and Institutional Persons Act of 2000. Note the bizarre comment of the ADL Civil Rights representative as regards the revelations by Steven Emerson of The Investigative Project on Terrorism and others. They found on a member of the ICM board’s MySpace Page support for Hamas, a foreign terrorist group designated by the State Department.
Deborah Lauter, director of civil rights for the ADL, which sponsors a newly-formed ICOM  is one of those who maintain that political preference of an ICM board member Mosaad Rawash who supported Palestinian terrorist group Hamas  was  irrelevant.
Lauter allegedly told the Los Angeles Times that if all the members of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro were public cheerleaders for Hamas, it would still be illegal to discriminate against them because the First Amendment protects freedom of worship.
There is irony in the alliance between the Muslim Brotherhood and the ADL in undermining the constructive Florida American Law for American Courts legislation.   The purported Jewish defense group is betraying the State of Israel by allying itself with CAIR, a Muslim Brotherhood front that was founded as an affiliate of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine.  Let’s see how Messrs. Rosenkranz and Foxman rationalize their role in perpetrating this 'shariah victory’ as defense of freedom to worship.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Contentions Why Has J Street Defended Media Matters?



Back when the “Israel-Firsters” controversy first started to get picked up by major newspapers, J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami spoke to the Washington Post and defended Media Matters and Think Progress staffers who used the dual-loyalty charge.
“If the charge is that you’re putting the interests of another country before the interests of the United States in the way you would advocate that, it’s a legitimate question,” he told the Post.

Ben Ami is obviously no stranger to controversy, and by now he’s probably used to catching flack from the Jewish community. But the public condemnation in this instance was so swift and forceful that Ben Ami felt the need to rush out a clearly-panicked apology and weak clarification of his comments just hours after the article was published.
“I agree that the use of the term ‘Israel Firster’ is a bad choice of words. The conspiracy theory that American Jews have dual loyalty is just that, a conspiracy theory and must be refuted in the strongest possible way,” conceded Ben Ami, before urging the American Jewish community to stop debating the subject and focus on other issues.
The whole quote-and-recantation dance wasn’t exactly a surprise, considering J Street’s unlucky history with public relations. But the comments Ben Ami made to the Post were so wildly tone-deaf, so offensive, so far-off from reality – and in an interview he had no real obligation to give – that it was hard to imagine why he would ever make them in the first place.
So why do it? The Daily Caller reports on a funding overlap between J Street and Media Matters that raises one intriguing idea:
A source told The DC that [liberal philanthropist Bill] Benter donated to Media Matters, at least in part, so the liberal organization could bring MJ Rosenberg on board as its foreign policy voice.
Rosenberg has become a lightning rod for questioning the loyalty of American supporters of Israel by calling them “Israel-Firsters,” and for taking other radical positions. Alan Dershowitz, the liberal Harvard Law School professor, has denounced him in a series of recent interviews and articles, saying that Rosenberg’s rhetoric and ideas are similar to what neo-Nazi and pro-Hezbollah websites offer.
Bill Benter is the wealthy horse-better who helped financially prop up J Street when it was first getting off the ground. He also reportedly solicited over $800,000 in J Street contributions through a mysterious Hong Kong frontwoman named Consolacion Esdicul.
J Street didn’t return a call for comment about its current association with Benter today. But if Benter did specifically fund MJ Rosenberg’s position at Media Matters, it raises questions about whether this connection had anything to do with Ben Ami inserting himself into the controversy and initially defending Rosenberg’s indefensible dual-loyalty smears. Of course, J Street is the only group that would have the answer to that, and until they respond to requests for comment, it’s impossible to know for sure.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Stakelbeck on Terror Show: Islam's War on the Jews

On this week's edition of the Stakelbeck on Terror Show, we examine the roots of the Islamic world's animosity toward the Jewish people.
Watch as author Andrew Bostom discusses the history of Muslim anti-Semitism and shows how Islam's core texts promote these beliefs, which have been made official state policy by the Iranian regime today.

Click here to read more and watch the video.

Saturday, March 3, 2012

American Justice for American Victims of Arab Terrorism


More than a dozen of the Arab Palestinian convicts released in exchange for Gilad Shalit's freedom have American blood on their hands. There are American laws that provide for the prosecution in the United States of anyone who has harmed or killed an American, through an act of terrorism, overseas. Those freed convicts should be brought to justice in the United States. Please contact your members of congress and demand American Justice for American Victims of Arab Terrorism.


Friday, March 2, 2012

Being 'Pro-Israel' Isn't Enough – Forward.com

Being 'Pro-Israel' Isn't Enough – Forward.com

By Charles Jacobs and Avi Goldwasser

Published March 02, 2012, issue of March 09, 2012.


The David Project recently issued an important “white paper” that identifies the campus as the “primary path by which anti-Israelism enters the American public debate.” The report does a good job of describing the institutional and intellectual factors that are contributing to demonization of Israel on campus and that result — at some universities — in significant hostility toward Jewish students and faculty who support Israel.

These factors include an overwhelming percentage of professors who are ideological and promote leftist politics in the classroom; the influence and growth of Middle Eastern studies — a field that we believe is biased against Israel and whitewashes Islamist radicalism — and the significant impact of postmodernism and cultural relativism on framing the Middle East conflict.