Saturday, December 31, 2011

Palestinians 'built' barrier through their actions

by Mark Goldstein
read post in The Tennessean

Americans have empathy for people who
live under the yoke of tyranny, and
especially at this time of year in the part of
the world that is holy to so many of us.

I understand the concern of people like
Lynn Grassmeyer, in her Dec. 23 op-ed,
“Family sees daylight despite wall,” about
the plight of the Palestinians. I just question w
hy she would bring up the issue of what
she refers to as the “separation wall” as a
negative without showing the benefits.

In 2002, before the anti-terrorism barrier
was built, 457 Israelis were murdered in
terrorist attacks; in 2009, eight Israelis
were killed. Attacks by Palestinian terrorists
over the years have led to defensive
incursions by the Israeli Defense Forces
that have resulted in more death and
destruction on both sides...........


Dialogue with Radical Muslims is Dangerous for American Jews

by Jerry Gordon (January 2012)
READ ENTIRE ARTICLE




Introduction
Jewish interfaith dialogue with Muslims has moved beyond mere episodes to one of joint services and soon, joint sanctuaries. It is an insidious form of Da’wah (call to Islam) that some Jewish communal groups are dangerously courting, an act of self destruction undermining the future of the Jewish community in America. 
This dramatic shift is a reflection of a miscast liberal Jewish interpretation of Tikkun Olam - repairing the world. Miscast, because traditional Judaism views Tikkun Olam as the perfection of an exemplary life in the fulfillment the 613 mitzvoth, or good deeds. Interfaith dialogue began in earnest following World War Two in the aftermath of the Holocaust. It was reflected in joint Thanksgiving services with mainstream liberal Protestant churches. The liberal Jewish view of dialogue was institutionalized with the creation of Jewish Community Relations Councils (JCRCs) by Jewish Federations that were mandated to engage in outreach to the non-Jewish community. The JCRCs were also a reflection of Jewish activism in the civil rights movement of the 1950’s and 1960’s, and the anti-War movement during the Vietnam era. 
The major Jewish denominations through the leadership at the respective seminaries for the Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionist movements, and less so the traditional Orthodox seminaries, have institutionalized interfaith dialogue in training of new members of the rabbinate. 
Thus we find JCRCs, Jewish denominational seminary leaders showing up to break hallal bread with Muslim community leaders who are for the most part representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood. These Jewish community and religious leaders think nothing of attending annual meetings of MB groups like the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), CAIR, and urging their children to make common cause with Muslim Student Association (MSA) chapters in opposing counter-Jihad advocates on college and university campuses. We have found Hillel chapters supporting MSA college chapters, the later endeavoring to deny free speech to those critical of doctrinal Islam and its treatment of women, gays, apostates and unbelievers. There is ready acceptance of anti-Zionist and anti-Israel Jewish advocacy groups on local JCRC’s and even Jewish Federation Israel Action committees. Groups like Brit Tzedek v Shalom, the Jewish Alliance for Justice and Peace, which is now integrated with J Street’s local chapters. As a result, Jewish communal organizations harbor Jewish advocates of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions in the self destructive attempt to force recognition of a Palestinian state. A Palestinian state seeking to occupy “the space between the river and the sea” - Israel.
In this article we will demonstrate how aberrant and dangerous is the contemporary Jewish predilection to dialogue with its ancient Muslim enemies.....



Omaha’s Tri-Faith Project is Not Kosher
There’s a new twist to the mega mosque controversy in America: a tri-faith complex built on what was a Jewish Country Club in Omaha where billionaire investor Warren Buffet was once a member. It is called the Tri-Faith Initiative and it looks like the latest in inter-religious dialogue.
Rabbi Jonathan Hausman commented:
Let's see if I understand this situation. Reform synagogue teams up with Mainline Protestant church with dwindling attendance to provide cover for the inevitable zoning issues and protests that will ensue regarding construction of a mosque. Just perfect.
In late August, 2011, Omaha World Herald had a puff piece by columnist Michael Kelly boosting the project: “Kelly: Three-faith site planners persevere.” Kelly took a gratuitous swipe at the controversy surrounding the expansion of the Islamic Center in Murfreesboro while suggesting the project in Omaha hasn’t drawn any opposition from reform Jews and Episcopalians.
Leaders of Omaha's unique plan to build homes for three faiths at one location are proceeding with optimism, confident they will overcome a few whispers of unease.
In a world of turmoil and political-religious animosity, it is remarkable that the plan has advanced this far without public controversy. Nowhere else is a community doing what Omaha has set out to do: Build a synagogue, a mosque and a church next alongside one another, along with a fourth interfaith structure.
Quiet fears that have been expressed range from the possibility of diluting the respective religions, to worries about intermarriage or even the chance that extremists could view the site as a target.
Nonetheless, a feeling of good will prevails, even as leaders acknowledge that support is not unanimous.
But no protests or ugly incidents have occurred such as happened last year in Murfreesboro, Tenn., where a longtime mosque was planning to expand.
Kelly cites liberal national Jewish newspaper, The Forward, as believing the Omaha Tri-faith project marks a first:
In a metro area with a population of 850,000, the number of people directly affected by the tri-faith effort is relatively small — about 4,500 Episcopalians, 5,500 Jews and nearly that many Muslims.
Even though the tri-faith groups represent about 2 percent of the metro population, the Omaha effort is being watched elsewhere.
The national Jewish publication The Forward said this month that if the Omaha experiment works, it "will become a beacon of cooperation in a world of interreligious strife."
The Tri-Faith project has the usual spin from Muslim radio commentators and local Omaha Muslim leaders.
Dr. David Liepert, an author who bills himself as "The Optimistic Muslim," asked on his Internet radio show whether "Omaha, Neb., of all places, is the interfaith capital of the world."
For the mosque, Muslim leaders have hired a fundraiser who is Jewish and an architect who is Christian.
[. . .]
The often-unstated fear, given the world history of Muslims and Jews, is that disputes and protests someday could spill over into violence in Omaha or that the tri-faith site could be a target.
But according to Kelly all is not sweetness and light about the Tri-Faith project. Witness the objections to the project, an outgrowth of a new sanctuary for a Reform Temple and adjacent residential- commercial development in Omaha:
The houses of worship — the church is Episcopal — are planned for a 37-acre corner of the former Ironwood Golf Course. It was originally the Highland Country Club, built long ago by Jews when they were not allowed to join existing country clubs.
The tri-faith site, east of 132nd Street between Pacific Street and West Center Road, would be part of a much larger residential-commercial development called Sterling Ridge. When the Omaha City Council held a hearing, neighbors objected to parts of the overall development, but no one opposed the tri-faith plan.
Nine years ago, well before such a plan was discussed, Temple Israel began studying what to do with its synagogue at 7023 Cass St., its location since 1954. This past May 15th, the congregation announced it had voted "overwhelmingly" to build a new synagogue at Sterling Ridge.
"It's very important for each religious community to decide on its own," said Rabbi Aryeh Azriel of Temple Israel. "We hear excitement about building a new synagogue. That is the goal of this congregation."
One who has raised objections is businessman and longtime Temple congregant Gary Javitch. He contends that some members did not understand at the time of the vote that the plan to build a synagogue was "deeply intertwined" with the plan for a tri-faith campus.
He even asked Temple leaders that a revote be taken with "an opportunity to choose another location as an option."
Javitch said he wants to know whether future next-door neighbors, who would attend the mosque, wish ill on Israel.
"In and of itself, I like the idea of talking with Muslims," Javitch said. "But before committing to a multimillion-dollar project, I want to know what we're getting into."
Muslims, Episcopalians and Jews involved in the tri-faith effort all want to know who their next-door neighbors are. Leaders say they have spent the past five years getting to know each other through joint gatherings, including a stirring event in March 2009 attended by more than 1,100 people — called "Dinner in Abraham's Tent: Conversations in Peace."
Notwithstanding sources of funding for the new Reform Temple and Episcopal Church, where are the funds going to come from to build the Mosque? An indication of that possibility can be found in this post on the ACT! Omaha Chapter website about recent renovations to the existing Islamic Center of Omaha (ICO):
The ICO has been busy remodeling and the project includes the building of a new minaret. The question of whether or not this minaret will be sounded 5 times every day (starting as early as 5 or 6 am) is yet to be seen or rather, heard.
The ICO is deeded to the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT).
NAIT represents at least two things:
· Saudi Arabian funding and Saudi Arabia’s extreme form of Islam, Wahhabism; and,
· NAIT is a Muslim Brotherhood (MB) front group.
Then there is the past radical leadership of the ICO, Imam Ahmed Alzaree, who left Omaha in 2007 and resigned in controversy before he could take a new post at a Cleveland, Ohio Mosque.
Not enough due diligence has been done by the benighted Jewish and Episcopalian participants in the Omaha Tri-Faith Initiative on their ICO Mosque partners. Rabbi Hausman commented on what the non-Muslim Tri-Faith partners should address:
Who will sit on the mosque's board, who will serve as officers, what links do/did/will these individuals have? What organizations have such people supported in the past (e.g. American Task Force for Palestine, ISNA, CAIR and other proven MB front groups)?
Noted theologian Dr. Richard L. Rubenstein commented:
I am appalled but not surprised at this tale out of Omaha. I wonder how much the mosque and the Episcopal Church paid for their land on the “defunct” Jewish country club and how much Jewish money would be put into this project.
Then, there is Mr. Freeman, Chairman of the Tri-Faith Initiative who was quoted in the Kelly article as saying:
“We’ve always known that the Middle East conflict will go on and on,” he said. “We are not going to bring peace to the Middle East or to the world. Are we supposed to wait for some kind of sign before we act decently to one another?”
As Rick Greenfield, publisher of The Connecticut Jewish Ledger commented: “when I see the word Tri Faith...I think of Traif (not Kosher)”......

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Mike Dobrin Responds to J-Street Event with Ben-Ami

 Having recently listened to Jeremy Ben-Ami speak in Nashville, I remain confused as to how he can promote a two state solution to the Middle East conflict without first, (or at least concurrently) resolving the steadfast refusal by Hamas and other Arab countries to recognize Israel's legitimacy, rather than their commitment to Israel's destruction. While I would agree with Ben-Ami's main point that Israel's current situation is not sustainable, it is his proposed solution to the situation with which I disagree.
Absent from the presentation was any acknowledgement that Israel does not have a partner with whom it can negotiate a two state solution. Hamas, which controls Gaza, and is now "partnering" with Fatah, exists to destroy "the Zionist entity".
How can Israel be expected to negotiate with leaders committed to their destruction?
Ben-Ami defines the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians as one of borders and territory. I see the conflict not as much about Israel's border as it is about Israel's very existence.
During the question & answer session, I had the opportunity to ask Ben-Ami if there was any Palestinian leader who would (in Arabic) recognize Israel as a Jewish state. To his credit, he acknowledged the answer is no. He went on to say that that is not, or ever has been the goal, and that it is up to Israel to determine its own identity.
Poland, Czechoslovakia, France and England thought they could determine their own identities in the 1930s. Their hostile neighbor had other ideas.  I would suggest that were Ben-Ami to honestly acknowledge the fundamental reasons for adament non-recognition, his two state solution would likely change nothing about the continued hostility of Israel's neighbors other than to make Israel's security yet more vulnerable.
Israel's sovereignty has never been respected by its hostile Arab neighbors. The tiny Jewish Nation only survived the wars of 1948, 1967 and 1973 due to military superiority; just as the Allies were able to survive the Nazis in World War II. Jeremy Ben-Ami is to the pro-Israel movement what Nelille Chamberlain was to the Allies prior to World War II.
I found it interesting that Ben-Ami spoke of his father's participation in the founding of Israel. He made reference to the resistance his politically right leaning father ran into attempting to silence him from the left; comparing it to the resistance his left leaning group has met from the right in this country, resulting in his need to form J-Street. I can appreciate Ben-Ami's perspective since I am among the conservative voices in the Nashville Jewish community which have been actively supressed by the liberally dominated Jewish media and leadership, necessitating the formation of the Nashville chapter of the National Conference on Jewish Affairs (NCJA) http://nationalconferenceonjewishaffairs.org/
At last, however, with new leadership from the Federation's Executive Director, our community is taking a positive step forward by allowing voices from all sides to be heard, including Mr. Ben-Ami. This inclusiveness must also include give voice to those who have thoughtfully and civilly pointed out the weakness in the J-Street argument, as well as J-Street's questionable funding by people and groups proven to be no friends of Israel.
J-Street does not own a monopoly on the desire for peace in the Middle East.
Daniel Gordis put it best in his address to the "J-Street Leadership Mission to Israel and Palestine":
"You believe that people who are not willing to make major territorial concessions to the Palestinians right now are not serious about a two-state solution.  You think that those of us who claim that we favor a two-state solution but who are not willing to give up the store at this moment are bluffing.  Or we're liars.  Or, at best, we're well-intentioned but misguided.  But bottom line, if we're not willing now to make the concessions that you think are called for, then we're not really pursuing peace.
But that is arrogance of the worst sort.  Does your distance from the conflict give you some moral clarity that we don't have?  Are you smarter than we are?  Are you less racist?  Why do you assume with such certainty that you have a monopoly on the wisdom needed to get to the goal we both seek?" To read Gordis' entire article, please visit http://danielgordis.org/2011/05/27/in-the-tent-or-out/

The Forgotten Refugees

WATCH THE MOVIE TRAILER

Monday, December 26, 2011

Netanyahu"s misleading lessons in governance

Netanyahu"s misleading lessons in governance

Supposedly ‘pro-Israel’ J Street part of Soros’ radical web: Group promoting ‘peace’ in Middle East tied to Occupy, MoveOn, ACORN, more.

READ ENTIRE POST BY AARON KLEIN

By Aaron Klein

JERUSALEM – J Street, the supposedly pro-Israel, pro-peace political action committee and lobbyist group, is actually backed by a controversial far-left clearinghouse financed by billionaire George Soros, KleinOnline has learned.

J Street claims to be pro-Israel, yet it has faced mounting criticism for its policies and advocacy that many argue is harmful to the Jewish state.

J Street’s executive director, Jeremy Ben Ami, is himself deeply tied to the controversial group, the Tides Center, which is heavily financed by Soros.....

Now KleinOnline’s revelation about Tides Center funding to J Street may open new avenues of concern about the Israel lobby group, including Ben Ami’s personal ties to Tides and its marketing partner, Fenton Communications.

J Street is further connected to tides through Hadar Susskind, vice president and managing director of Tides’ Washington, D.C., office. Prior to joining Tides, Susskind served as vice president of policy and strategy at J Street.

Moveon.org, ACORN Occupy Wall Street

Tides functions as a money tunnel where major leftist donors provide large sums that are channeled to hundreds of radical groups. One prominent Tides donor is Soros.

Tides recently has been closely linked to Occupy since the anti-Wall Street movement’s inception. The Tides-funded Adbusters magazine is reported to have come up with the Occupy Wall Street idea after Arab Spring protests toppled governments in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. The Adbusters website serves as a central hub for Occupy’s planning......

Sunday, December 25, 2011

J Street Accepted in Some, Not All, Cities – Forward.com

J Street Accepted in Some, Not All, Cities – Forward.com

Top English Islamic Cleric's Christmas Message

EGYPT’S ARAB SPRING in full bloom: Now, beatings, shootings, and even stripping of women protesters are the new norm

Gives new meaning to the expression, ‘Be careful what you wish for.’ Egyptians were ecstatic over their removal of a secular dictator with the help of the Army at their side. Now, that same Army are the ones beating and killing the protesters. But wait, the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical IslamoFascists just won the most seats in a recent election and will soon take power. You ain’t seen nuthin’yet.


When Azza Hilal Suleiman saw Egyptian military pummel the veiled woman, she stepped in to help and got kicked and clubbed by security forces, a beating that was captured in a video that went viral around the world and also showed live gunfire and the violent removal of a Muslim woman’s clothing. ”A veiled woman was injured and the army stripped her,” she told CNN in an exclusive interview from her hospital bed in Cairo, suffering from painful skull fractures and facial cuts.
She couldn’t stand to see the repeated blows to the woman, who was dragged, kicked, partially stripped and then stomped. “So I ran and tried to cover her body and pull her out,” Suleiman said. ”We tried to cover her and pull her away but they beat us. I didn’t feel anything after this.”



READ MORE

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Tom Friedman's Losing Battle

Read the Entire Article


For decades New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman balanced his substantively anti-Israel positions with repeated protestations of love for Israel.

His balancing act ended last week when he employed traditional anti-Semitic slurs to dismiss the authenticity of substantive American support for Israel.

Channeling the longstanding anti-Semitic charge that Jewish money buys support for power-hungry Jews best expressed in the forged 19th century Protocols of the Elders of Zion and in John Mearshimer's and Stephen Walt's 2007 book The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, Friedman denied the significance of the US Congress's overwhelming support for Israel.

As he put it, "I sure hope that Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, understands that the standing ovation he got in Congress this year was not for his politics. That ovation was bought and paid for by the Israel lobby."

It would be nice if Friedman is forced to pay some sort of price for finally coming out of the closet as a dyed-in-the-wool Israel hater. But he probably won't. As he made clear in his column, he isn't writing for the general public, but for a very small, select group of elitist leftists. These are the only people who matter to Friedman. And they matter to him because they share his opinions and his goal of indoctrinating young people to adopt his pathologically hostile views about Israel and his contempt for the American public that supports it.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Mt. Juliet TN Car Dealership Exposed For Funding Hezbollah

Read More
Cedar Car Exports Listed in The Complaint

10. Cedar Exports Auto Sales, Mt. Juliet, TN
Accounts:
a. account number 003780099354, held in the name of Cedar
Exports Auto Sales, at Bank of America NA, Richmond,
VA, and all funds traceable thereto;
b. account number 003780100146, held in the name of Cedar
Exports Auto Sales, at Bank of America NA, Richmond,
VA, and all funds traceable thereto;
c. account number 151205758239, held in the name of Cedar
Exports Auto Sales, at U.S. Bank National Association,
St. Paul, MN, and all funds traceable thereto;
d. account number 183725977, held in the name of Cedar
Exports Auto Sales, at First Tennessee Bank, Memphis,
TN, and all funds traceable thereto;
e. account number 3006360, held in the name of Cedar
Exports Auto Sales, at Reliant Bank, Brentwood, TN, and
all funds traceable thereto;

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Sheik of the Jordanian Tahrir Party, Discusses Jihad against Germany, Vows to Annihilate Israel

The Specter of Jizya Returns to Egypt

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/16/the-specter-of-jizya-returns-to-egypt/


In Egypt, calls for jizya—the tribute doctrinally demanded and historically collected from conquered infidels—are increasing day by day, by those who wish to be true to the words of Koran 9:29:
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor forbid that which Allah and his Messenger have forbidden, nor follow the religion of truth [Islam], from the People of the Book [Christians and Jews], until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves utterly subdued.
Accordingly, days ago, Ahmed Imran—a candidate of Egypt’s Salafi party, the “Party of Light,” which won some 20% of votes in recent elections—called for the return of jizya (which was abolished under colonial pressure in the mid 19th century).

(click on link above to read the whole article)

Friday, December 16, 2011

Netanhayu Rejects the New York Times

Big Journalism.com

Dear Sasha,
I received your email requesting that Prime Minister Netanyahu submit an op-ed to the New York Times. Unfortunately, we must respectfully decline.
On matters relating to Israel, the op-ed page of the “paper of record” has failed to heed the late Senator Moynihan’s admonition that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but that no one is entitled to their own facts.
A case in point was your decision last May to publish the following bit of historical revision by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas:
It is important to note that the last time the question of Palestinian statehood took center stage at the General Assembly, the question posed to the international community was whether our homeland should be partitioned into two states. In November 1947, the General Assembly made its recommendation and answered in the affirmative. Shortly thereafter, Zionist forces expelled Palestinian Arabs to ensure a decisive Jewish majority in the future state of Israel, and Arab armies intervened. War and further expulsions ensued.
This paragraph effectively turns on its head an event within living memory in which the Palestinians rejected the UN partition plan accepted by the Jews and then joined five Arab states in launching a war to annihilate the embryonic Jewish state. It should not have made it past the most rudimentary fact-checking.
The opinions of some of your regular columnists regarding Israel are well known. They consistently distort the positions of our government and ignore the steps it has taken to advance peace. They cavalierly defame our country by suggesting that marginal phenomena condemned by Prime Minister Netanyahu and virtually every Israeli official somehow reflects government policy or Israeli society as a whole. Worse, one columnist even stooped to suggesting that the strong expressions of support for Prime Minister Netanyahu during his speech this year to Congress was “bought and paid for by the Israel lobby” rather than a reflection of the broad support for Israel among the American people.
Yet instead of trying to balance these views with a different opinion, it would seem as if the surest way to get an op-ed published in the New York Times these days, no matter how obscure the writer or the viewpoint, is to attack Israel.
Even so, the recent piece on “Pinkwashing,” in which Israel is vilified for having the temerity to champion its record on gay-rights, set a new bar that will be hard for you to lower in the future.
Not to be accused of cherry-picking to prove a point, I discovered that during the last three months (September through November) you published 20 op-eds about Israel in the New York Times and International Herald Tribune. After dividing the op-eds into two categories, “positive” and “negative,” with “negative” meaning an attack against the State of Israel or the policies of its democratically elected government, I found that 19 out of 20 columns were “negative.”
The only “positive” piece was penned by Richard Goldstone (of the infamous Goldstone Report), in which he defended Israel against the slanderous charge of Apartheid.
Yet your decision to publish that op-ed came a few months after your paper reportedly rejected Goldstone’s previous submission. In that earlier piece, which was ultimately published in the Washington Post, the man who was quoted the world over for alleging that Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza, fundamentally changed his position. According to the New York Times op-ed page, that was apparently news unfit to print.
Your refusal to publish “positive” pieces about Israel apparently does not stem from a shortage of supply. It was brought to my attention that the Majority Leader and Minority Whip of the U.S. House of Representatives jointly submitted an op-ed to your paper in September opposing the Palestinian action at the United Nations and supporting the call of both Israel and the Obama administration for direct negotiations without preconditions. In an age of intense partisanship, one would have thought that strong bipartisan support for Israel on such a timely issue would have made your cut.
So with all due respect to your prestigious paper, you will forgive us for declining your offer. We wouldn’t want to be seen as “Bibiwashing” the op-ed page of the New York Times.
Sincerely,
Ron Dermer
Senior advisor to Prime Minister Netanyahu

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Voices of Palestine: Fathi Hamad 

Voices of Palestine: Fathi Hamad

In its long quest to annihilate the state of Israel and all of its Jewish inhabitants, the Palestinian Islamic terror group Hamas has killed and maimed thousands of Israeli men, women and children through suicide and other terrorist attacks. In the process, Hamas has demonstrated an acute disregard for innocent human life.

Hamas’s contempt for basic human rights has not been confined to just Jews, but extends to even its own, best evidenced by the organization’s use of Palestinian children and women as both suicide bombers and human shields.

While most may find Hamas’s penchant for death over life morally repugnant, it has found a staunch champion in Fathi Hamad, Interior Minister for the Hamas-controlled Gaza government since 2009.


(click on link to read more)

Letter to Lowes and ADL re: “American Muslim”

Letter to Lowes and ADL re: “American Muslim”

by Bill Levinson

(Re: http://www.adl.org/PresRele/DiRaB_41/6091_41.htm)
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was once a very respectable organization, and my father thought the world of it. That was 20 or 30 years ago. The past five or six years have however seen ADL do the following, all on Mr. Foxman’s watch.

(1) ADL used its nominally Jewish identity to whitewash MoveOn.org’s knowing and willful hosting of anti-Semitic and other hate speech at its now-disgraced Action Forum.
(2) ADL engaged in conduct one step short of Holocaust denial by encouraging Congress to reject recognition of Turkey’s genocide of Armenians. Abraham Foxman fired ADL director Andrew Tarsy for refusing to go along with this outrage, whereupon two other ADL leaders quit in disgust.
(3) Abraham Foxman helped legitimize the prominent racist and anti-Semite (e.g. Freddy’s Fashion Mart) Al Sharpton by issuing a joint statement with him.
(4) ADL has attacked Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller for their efforts to expose the menace of militant Islam (which has in its own words declared its intention to annihilate Jews and take over the world, much like another ideology did during the late 1930s), and has denounced them and others as “Islamophobes.”

While the ADL is correct that “Most American Muslims are peace-loving, law-abiding citizens who cherish their life in America just as much as Christians, Jews, and followers of countless other faith traditions,” there is a video of a militant Islamic woman calling for Jews to “go back to the ovens” during a rally in Fort Lauderdale while other Muslims chant “go to hell” and “Nuke Israel.” There are rallies in Europe in which militant Muslims call for Osama bin Laden to bomb Denmark so they can take Danish women as war booty. Other militant Muslims say publicly that they will annihilate Jews and rule the world, an agenda very similar to the one that came with a swastika during living memory. My perception of ADL is therefore similar to a perception of America First, the German-American Bund, and similar enablers of that particular ideology during the late 1930s—the ones who kept telling us that Hitler was a nice peace-loving person until his friends dropped bombs on us and then he declared war on us.

I rely on Lowes for most of my home improvement and repair needs, and I will definitely recommend Lowes to others. Pay no attention to the ADL; it has turned itself into a sick joke among knowledgeable Jews and the country as a whole. (I have posted a copy of this letter to a pro-Israel blog for which I write.)

Posted by Bill Levinson @ 10:57 pm | 1 Comment »

Friday, December 9, 2011

National Conference on Jewish Affairs calls on US Administration to Remove Amb. Gutman from his Post

National Conference on Jewish Affairs
calls on US Administration to Remove Amb. Gutman from his Post

Contact: Lori Lowenthal Marcus  610.664.1184                              December 7, 2011
               Beth Gilinsky
(212) 726-1124                                         For Immediate Release


The NCJA, a coalition of Jewish leaders and heads of Jewish, pro-Israel organizations, is appalled by the current US Ambassador to Belgian, Howard Gutman, trading on his ancestory and the tragedy of his familial suffering in the Holocaust to sanitize his double-headed affront regarding anti-Semitism.  At a time when there are well-documented increases in European anti-Semitism, including arson and other attacks on synagogues, defacements of Jewish cemeteries, physical violence against those wearing outwardly Jewish symbols, and anti-Semitic aspects to public protests on unrelated topics, Gutman's claim that there isn't any increase in anti-Semitism simply attests to his Ostrich qualities.  Even worse, his pronouncement that Israel itself is at fault for a different kind of anti-Semitism, because of its "failure" to achieve peace with the Arab Palestinians is staggering. 

"It is time for Jews to stop using their ancestry as an imprimatur of validity to their own anti-Israel views, and to their dangerous minimization of the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe and around the world," said Lori Lowenthal Marcus, chair of the NCJA executive committee.  "When the 'partner' with whom Israel is supposed to make peace refuses to recognize the Jewish nation's existence and continues naming public squares and soccer teams for murderers of Jews, it is grotesque for Gutman to blame anti-Semitism on Israel's 'recalcitrance'," said Marcus. 

Beth Gilinsky, executive director of NCJA, asked "How can it be that the official representative of the United States is telling the world that, despite all palpable evidence to the contrary, anti-Semitism is not on the rise?"  Gilinsky, a long-time advocate for Jewish causes, said "Gutman is a disgrace for having made those statements both because he officially represents the views of the United States and because he is a Jew."

The National Conference on Jewish Affairs is
an umbrella organization of American Jewish leaders and groups which work to uphold the American Constitution and liberty, promote a strong and safe Israel and Jewish rights in the Land of Israel, initiate positive relations with our non-Jewish friends, protect our Jewish young people in educational institutions, and assert the rights and security of Jewish People across the globe.  NCJA is adamantly opposed to making concessions to terrorists in the Middle East, or anywhere else across the globe.  The NCJA calls on this US Administration to recall Amb. Gutman from his post.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Appeals Court Affirms Holy Land Convictions

source article
Article in National Review By Andrew McCarthy
In Texas today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit has upheld the convictions of five jihadists behind the Holy Land Foundation, the piggy bank set up by the Brotherhood in the U.S., under the guise of “charity,” to fund Hamas to the tune of tens of millions of dollars during the deadly intifada.
The three-judge panel’s unanimous 170-page opinion recounts that Hamas was created by Brotherhood operatives in 1987 as the Brotherhood’s “Palestinian branch.” Thereafter, “the Muslim Brotherhood directed its world-wide chapters to establish so-called ‘Palestinian Committees’ to support Hamas from abroad.” In the U.S., the “Palestine Committee” was led by Mousa Abu Marzook (who, for a time in the early Nineties, actually ran Hamas from his home in Virginia). The Palestine Committee created not only the Holy Land Foundation but a number of other Islamist entities in the U.S. The leaders of one of those entities, the Islamic Association for Palestine, subsequently created CAIR — the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which was cited as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case.
H/T: Will Amos
by Rusty Shackelford

Israel's Mona Lisa Weapon

Meet Israel’s secret weapon against terrorism, code named “Mona Lisa.”   Not only is Mona Lisa an effective weapon against Arab anti-Israel terrorism and Islamofascism, but she is also one of the most effective weapons in the Israeli arsenal against the guttersnipes screaming about imaginary “Israel Apartheid.”  Let us sit back and watch in amusement as Hitlerjugend from the “Boycott and Divest from Israel” movement and their fellow jihad travelers try to cope with our Mona.
There are two critical things you need to know about this new secret weapon.  The first is that Mona Lisa is the real name of an Israeli woman combat soldier.  At her parents’ suggestion – she writes it as a single word, Monalisa (Nat King Cole did the same!).   The second thing you need to know is that she is an Arab.
Read More

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Sunday, December 4, 2011

ADL-Addled In Michagan

ADL – Addled in Michigan




Charles Jacobs


It might have been just some local government scandal: A shuttered public school sold in a no-bid contract to a private buyer after officials told other interested buyers the building was not up for sale; residents up in arms and suing. … Nasty, but it could happen almost anywhere.

It turns out, however, that the new owner plans to turn the school into a mosque. And that among the buyers who were turned away was a religious Jewish school. And that the mosquebuilding group is affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. And that the Anti- Defamation League – the nation’s largest Jewish defense organization – did nothing for the Jewish school, but is defending the mosque deal. This is not just some local corruption story.

The drama is unfolding in Michigan’s Farmington public schools, a district in the most affluent county in the state, not far from Dearborn and Detroit. The Islamic Cultural Association of Michigan (ICA) – the organization that got the inside deal – is affiliated with the North American Islamic Trust – which is, according to federal authorities, a Muslim Brotherhood front. The ICA invited the vicious anti-Semite Norman Finkelstein to lecture to its members. The Brotherhood’s recent massive rally in Cairo featured mass chants of “kill all the Jews.”

When the good citizens of Farmington Hills discovered what had transpired, they were angry but also perplexed. How did the ICA snatch up the school behind the public’s back? Some initial digging unearthed a set of circumstantial facts that might whet the appetite of a prosecutor:

The school district’s legal firm, Miller Canfield, funds an interfaith project that is closely allied with a state-wide Muslim umbrella group – the Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan, of which the ICA is a member. Miller Canfield was also the main sponsor of a speech by controversial Muslim scholar Tariq Ramadan, a Swiss citizen who had been banned by the Bush administration from the United States because of his ties to Hamas fundraising, but since allowed in on a visa. Ramadan was recently videotaped praying that Allah “strike the enemies of Islam” in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan (view him at Bit.ly/vao7OZ).

Miller Canfield provided a secret property appraisal that cinched the $1.1 million deal between the school district and the ICA. When Farmington residents asked for the details of the appraisal, the school board denied the request, claiming lawyerclient privilege between itself and Miller Canfield.

A local news outlet sifted through county records and found that two school board members up for re-election had received campaign donations from ICA members. One, Karen Bolsen, received almost half of her campaign funds from people at the ICA. Just two days before a critical school board decision on the sale, a self-identified ICA member donated $2,000 to Bolsen’s campaign, double the legal limit.

On June 14, at an explosive school board meeting lasting past midnight, residents questioned the district’s failure to follow normal and transparent procedures. Speakers, many of them from outside the district, supported the deal. They claimed their opponents weren’t really bothered by breaches of fiduciary duty, but instead were motivated by racism and Islamophobia.

Calling ICA members his “constituents,” Dawud Walid, executive director of the local branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), made that same accusation. CAIR is a radical organization, identified by federal authorities as a front for Hamas, a terror group with a charter that calls for genocide of the Jews.

School officials joined in the attack. Board member Bolsen complained of the “feeling of hate … directed at us.” Board member Timothy Devine called the opponents “abominable, juvenile.” Board member Sheilah Clay told the residents: “You made me disappointed. … I’m sure that when African Americans moved into Farmington you probably said the same thing.”

CAIR’s use of the “bigotry” card surprised no one. What did surprise was the seeming alliance between CAIR and some of Detroit’s Jewish leaders. Concurring with CAIR’s Walid in support of the deal were Betsy Kellman, ADL’s Michigan director, and Robert Cohen, executive director of the Detroit Jewish Community Relations Council. They accused Farmington residents of having “strong anti-Muslim feelings” and “making generalizations about Muslims.”

They said nothing about the proposed mosque’s radical links or its likely animus toward their own Jewish constituents. They said nothing about the board’s barring the Jewish school from buying the property. CAIR thanked them for their support and then falsely attacked the pro- Israel group StandWithUs for instigating the opposition. In a phone interview, ADL’s Kellman told me she knew nothing about other buyers being turned down. She did not know that ICA is linked to the North American Islamic Trust. She did not know that the Islamic trust is a Muslim Brotherhood front. She told me it was the Huda Muslim school that invited Finkelstein, not the ICA. She did not know that the Huda school is operated by the ICA. She told me that the whole issue is dead because a lawsuit by opponents of the ICA purchase was thrown out of court. This is also not true – the case is pending in appeals court.

When I asked why the Huda school would have invited Finkelstein, she said she didn’t know. When I asked how she could be sure that ICA was not tied to radicals, she referred me to the ICA Web site. “They pledge not to take foreign money.” Not exactly a vigorous vetting.

Kellman chairs the interfaith group ALPACT, which includes CAIR. She defends that by saying that law enforcement agencies and the NAACP also belong. In 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder caused controversy when he addressed an ALPACT meeting with CAIR present – despite an FBI policy not to deal with CAIR.

I would admire a Jewish leader who quit ALPACT and used the occasion to instruct the public on the dangers of Islamist Jew-hatred.

Abe Foxman, ADL’s national head, acknowledges that Islamic Jew hatred poses the biggest threat to Jewish life, yet he does little to educate and warn Jews about it: Over the last 15 years, for example, only 3 percent of ADL’s press releases focused on Islamic extremism and Arab anti- Semitism (see www.charles jacobs.org). Foxman told The Advocate that his organization feels it must fight “Islamophobia” – so that the Muslim community “will stand with us.” Even if this were not as naively delusional as it sounds, why does opposing some presumed anti- Muslim bias require the ADL to support radical Muslim groups who invite Norman Finkelstein? Is inattention to radical Islam’s deadly threat to Jews part of ADL’s strategy to get Muslims to “stand with us?”

Finally, President Barack Obama himself just signed a law prohibiting the FBI from dealing with terrorism trials’ unindicted co-conspirators – groups like CAIR and the ICA-affiliated North American Islamic Trust. What in heaven’s name is the ADL doing?

Charles Jacobs, president of Americans for Peace and Tolerance, wrote this column with researcher Ilya Feoktistov.

Friday, December 2, 2011

J Street: "Maybe Israel Ain't A Good Idea-by Lori Lowenthal Marcus

Read the entire article. 

"...."Maybe, if this collective Jewish presence" -- that is, the Jewish State in the Middle East -- "can only survive by the sword, then Israel really ain't a good idea."  So said Daniel Levy, one of J Street's founders, at the 2011 J Street Conference.  You can hear him, and the lack of any objection from even one of the 2000-strong audience, here, at 1:26:15 on the J Street Conference video, on J Street's own website.

Are we there yet?  Is this clear statement by one of J Street's founders -- that if the Arabs will force Israel to defend herself, then the Jews should abandon the Middle East -- enough to prove that J Street is not "pro-Israel" at all?  Is this confession enough to enable (or force) people to see that it is this belief: that the Jews are simply wrong to defend themselves ever, including against Gazan terrorism or a nuclear Iran, that constitutes the foundation of J Street?..."

J Street Comes to Nashville

Jeremy Ben-Ami is speaking at Lowe's Hotel on Monday, December 12th.
INFO ON EVENT

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Muslim Brotherhood Holds Venomous Anti-Israeli Rally in Cairo Mosque Friday

Read the complete article from Ynet News


"...A Muslim Brotherhood rally in Cairo's most prominent mosque Friday turned into a venomous anti-Israel protest, with attendants vowing to "one day kill all Jews."  ....

"'We have different mentality'  

Muslim Brotherhood spokesmen, as well as Palestinian guest speakers, made explicit calls for Jihad and for liberating the whole of Palestine. Time and again, a Koran quote vowing that "one day we shall kill all the Jews" was uttered at the site. Meanwhile, businessmen in the crowd were urged to invest funds in Jerusalem in order to prevent the acquisition of land and homes by Jews.

Throughout the event, Muslim Brotherhood activists chanted: "Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, judgment day has come."

Speaking to Ynet outside the mosque following the prayer, elementary school teacher Ala al-Din said that "all Egyptian Muslims are willing to embark on Jihad for the sake of Palestine."

"Why is the US losing in Afghanistan? Because the other side is willing and wants to die. We have a different mentality than that of the Americans and Jews," he said.  "

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

from "Sharia's Encroachment Into American Courts"
by Janet Levy
This article has an excellent discussion of the difference between Islamic Law, or sharia, and Jewish Law.
to read more Click Here

"Jewish Law and Catholic Canon Law 

Many who defend rulings that follow Islamic doctrine or sharia make spurious comparisons to Jewish law and Catholic Canon law.  These comparisons are disingenuous because the distinctions couldn't be more striking between sharia and the laws of Jews and Catholics.

Islamic law or sharia is supremacist and triumphalist.  The Koran commands Muslims to change secular laws to conform to sharia or to impose sharia worldwide.  In Muslim countries, the mosque is both the state and the court.  Disobeying sharia can be punished by flogging or death.

By contrast, Jewish (Halacha) and Catholic Canon laws are never imposed even for Jews and Catholics, respectively.  Under Jewish law and Canon law, any two parties in a dispute can choose to seek and follow a decision rendered by a religious court, but they are always free to pursue secular redress.  In fact, Jews and Catholics are required to follow secular law and are under no obligation whatsoever to abide by Jewish or Catholic Church doctrine.  The dictum in Jewish law of "Dina d'malchuta dina" translates to "the law of the land is law" and recognizes non-Jewish laws and non-Jewish legal jurisdiction as binding on Jewish citizens.  Jewish law does not operate under a supremacist power structure like Islamic doctrine.  It is unenforceable, and it is not a replacement for constitutional law."

-- 
Respectfully,
Daniel Bregman
District Leader
NCJA-NASHVILLE